<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Whimwit.com &#187; Observatory</title>
	<link>http://www.whimwit.com</link>
	<description>Hard at Play</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 19:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>SXSW</title>
		<link>http://www.whimwit.com/2008/03/16/sxsw/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whimwit.com/2008/03/16/sxsw/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 20:10:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anastasia</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Observatory]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[austin]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[observations]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[sxsw]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whimwit.com/2008/03/16/sxsw/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear residents of Austin, Texas— 
There are 1300 bands in town, and you will be listening to some live music. Too broke to buy badges? Not going to 6th street? Oh, that’s all right. We’ll just wait for you at the place where you get your morning coffee. That neighborhood bar? Already there. Not planning [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear residents of Austin, Texas— </p>
<p>There are 1300 bands in town, and you will be listening to some live music. Too broke to buy badges? Not going to 6th street? Oh, that’s all right. We’ll just wait for you at the place where you get your morning coffee. That neighborhood bar? Already there. Not planning to leave your house? That’s just fine, you naïve motherfucker. You haven’t sound-proofed your windows, and we’ll get you one way or another.  </p>
<p>And if you don’t like the three-chord repertoire of the whiny alternative band playing down the street, you best go and get yourself on a guest list at a place that has a more discriminating taste in music.  All your ears are belong to us. Resistance is futile. You will find a show you like or bleed out your ears while trying. </p>
<p>Sincerely,<br />
South By</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whimwit.com/2008/03/16/sxsw/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Clip Book</title>
		<link>http://www.whimwit.com/2007/11/30/clip-book/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whimwit.com/2007/11/30/clip-book/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 20:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anastasia</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Clipped]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Lit Buzz]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Observatory]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[book reviews]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[movies]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whimwit.com/2007/11/30/clip-book/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From Roger Ebert: 
Q. You&#8217;re gonna love this: Sciencedaily.com has an article stating, &#8220;Worker bees, wasps, and ants are often considered neuter. But in many species they are females with ovaries, who although unable to mate, can lay unfertilized eggs which turn into males if reared. For some species, such as bumble bees, this is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>From <a href="http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/section?category=ANSWERMAN">Roger Ebert</a>: </strong></p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Q. </strong><em>You&#8217;re gonna love this: Sciencedaily.com has an article stating, &#8220;Worker bees, wasps, and ants are often considered neuter. But in many species they are females with ovaries, who although unable to mate, can lay unfertilized eggs which turn into males if reared. For some species, such as bumble bees, this is the source of many of the males in the species. But in others, like the honeybee, workers &#8220;police&#8221; each other &#8212; killing eggs laid by workers or confronting egg-laying workers.&#8221; You have opened a Pandora&#8217;s box. Although what just occurred to me is that this article, or even just that paragraph, could have been the genesis for a very interesting movie about bees. </em><br />
<strong>Raymond Ogilvie, Philadelphia</strong></p>
<p><strong>A.</strong> What I have learned from this whole &#8220;Bee Movie&#8221; discussion is that bees have very confused and sad sex lives, and are much in need of intelligent design.</p></blockquote>
<p>From Русский Журнал [RU] in a review of a <a href="http://www.russ.ru/culture/teksty/metamorfozy_politizdata">Russian bookfare</a>, my translation:</p>
<blockquote><p>That [novel] which is now called a mystery is usually a mix of thriller, social commentary drama and elements of fantasy. Moreover, readers expect exactly this from a mystery. The famed <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Menippus">&#8220;Menippean</a> satire,&#8221; a type of dramedy that thirty years ago existed only in <em><a href="http://www.powells.com/cgi-bin/biblio?inkey=61-9780679760801-0">Master and Margarita</a> </em>and <em>Altoist Danilov, </em>seems to be becoming hegemonic.</p>
<p>In general, an average contemporary anthology would resemble some Afghan souvenir&#8211;a traditional rug, on which, along with ethnic motiffs, are weaved the conditionally-realistic automatic rifles and helicopters with humanitarian aid.</p></blockquote>
<p>Over at Post Road, Brock Clark had written a <a href="http://www.postroadmag.com/13/recommends/Clarke.phtml">review</a> that had compelled me to get my butt over to the nearest bookstore without stopping for coffee or passing go.</p>
<blockquote><p><em>The Prime of Miss Jean Brodie </em>is a great, great novel, the kind              of novel you wish you’d written, the kind of novel that makes              other superficially similar novels seem bloated, lumbering, and              besides the point&#8230;.               Briefly (and it is a brief novel: 137 pages), it is about Miss              Jean Brodie&#8230;who constantly            talks             about being in her “prime,” who says the girls are (or            could be) the “crème             de la crème,” who reminds them there “needs must be a            leaven in the             lump,” and, finally, is reduced to repeatedly asking the girls            (as adults)             which one them of them “betrayed” her&#8230;</p>
<p>And I haven’t even talked about the prose yet, which is hilarious,             biting, lovely, usually at the same time. How can you not love a            character  like Sandy who, when an aged Miss Jean Brodie moans, “I            am past my             prime,” reassures her that, “It was a good prime”?            How could you not love             abook in which “The evening paper rattle-snaked its way through            the             letter boxand there was suddenly a six-o’clock feeling in the            house”? How             could you not love a novelist who gives her characters only a handful            of             ways to talk about the world, and have that be more than enough? How             could anyone not love such a book? It’s enough to make you             hate the people             you don’t, enough to make a man forget, momentarily, his broken            pinky.</p></blockquote>
<p>Lastly, but not leastly, the comics over at the <a href="http://pbfcomics.com/?cid=PBF236-Road_Test.gif">Perry</a> <a href="http://pbfcomics.com/?cid=PBF237-Lyles_Constant.gif">Bible</a> <a href="http://pbfcomics.com/?cid=PBF214-Hard_Read.jpg">Fellowship</a> are delicious. Think Far Side.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whimwit.com/2007/11/30/clip-book/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Calling cards</title>
		<link>http://www.whimwit.com/2007/11/20/calling-cards/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whimwit.com/2007/11/20/calling-cards/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 05:41:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anastasia</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Observatory]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[austin]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[stationery]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whimwit.com/2007/11/20/calling-cards/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I went to a writers&#8217; happy hour in Austin. Now, in other cities, people wanting to make small talk will ask dreaded questions like, &#8220;So what all have you published?&#8221; But not in Austin. In Austin they ask, &#8220;So do you have a card for your website?&#8221; And boy, do they ever. I walked away [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I went to a writers&#8217; happy hour in Austin. Now, in other cities, people wanting to make small talk will ask dreaded questions like, &#8220;So what all have you published?&#8221; But not in Austin. In Austin they ask, &#8220;So do you have a card for your website?&#8221; And boy, do they ever. I walked away with forty. Most probably, no one&#8217;s going to look at them all, but who cares? The card&#8217;s the important thing. If the conversation still wasn&#8217;t happening, you could follow your original question with something like, &#8220;Wow, I really like the design.&#8221; We writers are an awkward bunch. Always on the look-out for small talk and material.</p>
<p>In any case, it made me miss the days of business cards to call my own. You know, lunch giveaway lotteries at the corner deli. That seemingly charming habit that I&#8217;d never acquired of writing something funny on the back. Handing over a card instead of having to spend ten minutes spelling my name. I&#8217;ve since tried saying &#8220;Anastasia, spelled like the Russian princess,&#8221; but for some incredible reason, I get stares.</p>
<p>Well, I&#8217;m now the proud orderer of calling cards. I&#8217;ll let you know how the quality works out, but in the meantime, here&#8217;s a <a href="http://www.oldhouseweb.com/stories/Detailed/10484.shtml">calling </a><a href="http://ask.metafilter.com/64220/Calling-cards-not-for-cheap-longdistance">card </a>for one person who was in no need of any:</p>
<p><img src="http://www.samanthasmith.info/Samantha%20Smith%20Collection/yandropov%20card.jpg" alt="Andropov" align="left" height="170" width="300" /><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andropov"></a></p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andropov">Yuriy Vladimirovich Andropov</a></p>
<p>General Secretary of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, Chairman of the Presidium of Chief Soviet of the USSR</p>
<p>No contact info specified. I guess back then everyone knew how to find the Kremlin.</p>
<p>Part of the Samantha Smith <a href="http://www.samanthasmith.info/collection.htm">Collection </a>at the Maine Library.</p>
<p>Someone somewhere ought to design some cards for persons in no need of introductions, whether their titles be real or aspirational.</p>
<p>Tangent: chances of finding a stylish design <a href="http://images.google.com/images?svnum=10&amp;um=1&amp;hl=en&amp;client=firefox-a&amp;rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&amp;q=business+cards+classy&amp;btnG=Search+Images">decrease </a>with the addition of the term &#8220;classy&#8221; to google image search.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whimwit.com/2007/11/20/calling-cards/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Return of Rhetoric</title>
		<link>http://www.whimwit.com/2007/03/16/the-return-of-rhetoric/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whimwit.com/2007/03/16/the-return-of-rhetoric/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2007 01:27:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anastasia</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Observatory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whimwit.com/2007/03/16/the-return-of-rhetoric/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rhetoric has returned to Russian news. Or perhaps it has never left. In any case, here&#8217;s Lyudmila Butuzova writing an article for Moscow News1 about a survey on attitudes of people in rural Russia:
&#8220;Needless to say, dreams and reality are different things,&#8221; Project Director Svetlana Krechetova says. &#8220;But this distinct &#8216;joie de vivre&#8217; group, which [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rhetoric has returned to Russian news. Or perhaps it has never left. In any case, here&#8217;s Lyudmila Butuzova writing an article for Moscow News<sup>1</sup> about a survey on attitudes of people in rural Russia:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Needless to say, dreams and reality are different things,&#8221; Project Director Svetlana Krechetova says. &#8220;But this distinct &#8216;joie de vivre&#8217; group, which has a different array of value priorities (focusing on family values and shared joy)<sup>2</sup>, is an unmistakable indication that <strong>life is changing for the better</strong><sup>3</sup>, that society is becoming more open. Although from a sociologist&#8217;s perspective, no revolutionary changes have occurred in the Russian hinterland. I would put it this way: The past few years have been marked by a further <strong>stabilization of stability.</strong><sup>4</sup>&#8220;</p></blockquote>
<p>1 Disclaimer: I have no knowledge of Moscow News&#8217; political affiliation.</p>
<p>2 Note the violation of a cardinal rule of writing dialogue in <em>fiction</em>: no one ever speaks in parentheses. Unless this interview was being carried out over email, I really doubt this is the unedited version of Krechetova&#8217;s quote.</p>
<p>3 &#8220;Life is getting better, life is getting merrier.&#8221; Oh, how we love thee, old slogan of Stalinism!<br />
<small>Thank you, Comrade Putin, for our happy childhood&#8230;</small> <a href="http://www.whimwit.com/2007/03/16/the-return-of-rhetoric/#more-69" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whimwit.com/2007/03/16/the-return-of-rhetoric/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Children&#8217;s Books Today</title>
		<link>http://www.whimwit.com/2006/12/05/childrens-books-today/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whimwit.com/2006/12/05/childrens-books-today/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 01:11:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anastasia</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Observatory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whimwit.com/2006/12/05/childrens-books-today/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
&#8220;No Kierkegaard, please.&#8221; Via Maud.
Researcher in New Zealand discovers universal baby language, and languagehat is trying &#8220;not to be too hard-nosed about this.&#8221; Owh. 


]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<ul>
<li><a href="http://lancemannion.typepad.com/lance_mannion/2006/12/goodnight_cruel.html">&#8220;<em>No Kierkegaard, please.&#8221;</em></a><em> </em>Via <a href="http://www.maudnewton.com">Maud</a>.</li>
<li>Researcher in New Zealand discovers universal baby language, and languagehat is trying &#8220;not to be too hard-nosed about this.&#8221; <a href="http://www.languagehat.com/archives/002570.php">Owh. </a></li>
</ul>
<p><a href="http://lancemannion.typepad.com/lance_mannion/2006/12/goodnight_cruel.html"><em /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whimwit.com/2006/12/05/childrens-books-today/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Borat Conjecture</title>
		<link>http://www.whimwit.com/2006/11/14/the-borat-conjuncture/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whimwit.com/2006/11/14/the-borat-conjuncture/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 03:58:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anastasia</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Observatory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whimwit.com/2006/11/14/the-borat-conjuncture/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FACT #1: Borat will not be showing in Russian theaters since a film commission, reviewing the movie at the request of the studio, concluded the audiences would find it too offensive.
FACT #2: The movie was #1 movie at the US box office for two weeks now, raking in a cool $67 mill.
FACT #3: The thought [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FACT #1: Borat will not be showing in Russian theaters since a film commission, reviewing the movie at the request of the studio, concluded the audiences would find it too offensive.</p>
<p>FACT #2: The movie was #1 movie at the US box office for two weeks now, raking in a cool $67 mill.</p>
<p>FACT #3: The thought of a sequel is making student executives everywhere just plain overflow with jubilation.</p>
<p>COMPLICATION: Yet just about everyone in US will recognize Borat. Or will go up and ask for an autograph. Or scream Jagshamesh at him. Or, if the poor man happens to be in my former home neighborhood of Hell&#8217;s Kitchen, <a href="http://www.hollywood.com/news/detail/id/3583767">beat him up</a>.</p>
<p>SOLUTION: Cultural Learnings of Russia to Make Benefit the Glorious Nation of Kazakhstan</p>
<p>UPSHOT: Revenge! Revenge!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whimwit.com/2006/11/14/the-borat-conjuncture/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>You Can&#8217;t Make This Stuff Up</title>
		<link>http://www.whimwit.com/2006/11/04/you-cant-make-this-stuff-up/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whimwit.com/2006/11/04/you-cant-make-this-stuff-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Nov 2006 07:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anastasia</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Humor]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Observatory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whimwit.com/2006/11/04/you-cant-make-this-stuff-up/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe I&#8217;m just still reeling from Borat, but this article from the Times is priceless. I wish I got paid to write headlines like this:
NAKED MAN ARRESTED FOR CONCEALED WEAPON.
Especially when the articles come with the incredible quotes like:
&#8221;You can&#8217;t get much more concealed than that,&#8221; Horgan said.
Link to the Times.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe I&#8217;m just still reeling from <em>Borat</em>, but this article from the Times is priceless. I wish I got paid to write headlines like this:</p>
<p>NAKED MAN ARRESTED FOR CONCEALED WEAPON.</p>
<p>Especially when the articles come with the incredible quotes like:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8221;You can&#8217;t get much more concealed than that,&#8221; Horgan said.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-Armed-and-Naked.html">Link </a>to the Times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whimwit.com/2006/11/04/you-cant-make-this-stuff-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Eros and politics</title>
		<link>http://www.whimwit.com/2006/11/01/eros-and-politics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whimwit.com/2006/11/01/eros-and-politics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2006 20:25:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anastasia</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Observatory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whimwit.com/2006/11/01/eros-and-politics/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This was the sweetest flesh I had ever tasted, including fish and fowl.
In continuation of our coverage of George Allen&#8217;s attempt at creating a political controversy over the sex bits in Webb&#8217;s books (see first post here), we now bring you the Slate quiz. Match the politican turned writer to the sex scene. Read some [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>This was the sweetest flesh I had ever tasted, including fish and fowl.</p></blockquote>
<p>In continuation of our coverage of George Allen&#8217;s attempt at creating a political controversy over the sex bits in Webb&#8217;s books (see first post <a href="http://www.whimwit.com/2006/10/28/literary-criticism-as-political/">here</a>), we now bring you the Slate quiz. Match the politican turned writer to the sex scene. Read some fabulously bad erotic writing. All <a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2152402/nav/tap1/">here </a>at Slate for your voyeuristic pleasure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whimwit.com/2006/11/01/eros-and-politics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Literary Criticism in Politics</title>
		<link>http://www.whimwit.com/2006/10/28/literary-criticism-as-political/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whimwit.com/2006/10/28/literary-criticism-as-political/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2006 15:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anastasia</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Observatory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whimwit.com/?p=12</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Virginia Senate candidate George Allen, who still has not recovered from a YouTube induced malestrom of discontent over racially charged comments,* is resorting to the lowest of all mud-slinging techniques: literary criticism.
In a press release to the media that Allen had not posted to the press portion of his web site (afraid of blog links?), [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Virginia Senate candidate George Allen, who still has not recovered from a <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pL3Q9gUEvtA">YouTube</a> induced malestrom of discontent over racially charged comments,* is resorting to the lowest of all mud-slinging techniques: literary criticism.</p>
<p>In a press release to the media that Allen had not posted to the press portion of his web site (afraid of blog links?), he claimed that his opponent&#8217;s Jim Webb&#8217;s novels indicated a chauvinist and misogynistic attitude inappropriate for anyone representing the familiees of Virginia. I&#8217;d really love to quote the former governor&#8217;s gems of critical genius, but alas, I hadn&#8217;t found any actual explications of the passages.</p>
<p>This response from Webb, as quoted on <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/10/27/webb.allen/">CNN</a>, seems to merit reproduction here however:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;There is nothing that&#8217;s been in any of my novels that, in my view, hasn&#8217;t been either illuminating surroundings or defining a character or moving a plot,&#8221; Webb said.</p></blockquote>
<p>God, I&#8217;d love to be able to say the same. What discipline. What stamina. To whittle down five novels to nothing but the absolute essentials, with no flights of whimsy or comic detours. I do wonder where the good senator gets the time.</p>
<p><code /></p>
<hr />
<blockquote><p>*Most of the accusations of racism based on Allen&#8217;s joke in the footage have focused on his use of the word &#8220;macaca.&#8221; What I personally find even more outrageous is a seemingly more innocent remark: &#8220;Welcome to America.&#8221; The kid shadowing Allen for the Webb campaign at whom the comments were directed was South Asian. To assume that anyone of his skin color is an immigrant and not a natural born American, as the Webb staffer indeed is, is deeply disturbing. It is indicative of a concept of America as a country for white men, where whites and perhaps blacks are citizens and everyone else is just a visitor.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whimwit.com/2006/10/28/literary-criticism-as-political/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Random Historical Fact of the Day</title>
		<link>http://www.whimwit.com/2006/04/25/random-historical-fact-of-the-day/</link>
		<comments>http://www.whimwit.com/2006/04/25/random-historical-fact-of-the-day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2006 19:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anoush</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Observatory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.whimwit.com/2006/04/25/random-historical-fact-of-the-day/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday, we here at Project Whimwit were proud to bring you Lincoln&#8217;s Broadsword Adventure. Today, we give you Victorian burial practices, in which we learn that high end caskets came with bells attached and attendants standing at the ready to dig you right out&#8211;just in case you were napping, and not really dead.
From Vampires: A [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday, we here at Project Whimwit were proud to bring you <a href="http://www.whimwit.com/2006/04/24/arr-broadswords/">Lincoln&#8217;s Broadsword Adventure</a>. Today, we give you Victorian burial practices, in which we learn that high end caskets came with bells attached and attendants standing at the ready to dig you right out&#8211;just in case you were napping, and not really dead.</p>
<p>From <a href="http://www.deliriumsrealm.com/delirium/articleview.asp?Post=70">Vampires: A Brief History (Part 1):</a></p>
<blockquote><p>We take for granted our society&#8217;s advances in medical technology, but back in the 18th and 19th centuries, there was a disease known as catalepsy, whereby the person looked as if he was dead. He might even be buried before he reawakened. You can imagine that one or two of these premature burials come back to life would reaffirm the belief in vampirism, particularly to the superstitious townsmen. (And being buried alive was apparently more common that you might think. If you look at coffin designs even from the 18th centuries, they would include wires with bells attached so if some poor soul happened to wake up and find himself buried alive, he could just ring the bell and one of the cemetery workers would dig him out.)</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.whimwit.com/2006/04/25/random-historical-fact-of-the-day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
